Search for: All records

The Cl–S mixed-anion sublattice of Li_1.6AlCl_3.4S_0.6creates face- and edge-shared octahedra that connect to form 3D ion conduction pathways with low activation energy barriers. 

Li_3.6In₇S_11.8Cl has a face-centered cubic arrangement of S²⁻/Cl⁻stabilized by Li⁺/In³⁺that form 3D ion conduction paths. The moisture stability and fast ion conduction make Li_3.6In₇S_11.8Cl a promising electrolyte for solid-state batteries. 

Understanding of structural and morphological evolution in nanomaterials is critical in tailoring their functionality for applications such as energy conversion and storage. Here, we examine irradiation effects on the morphology and structure of amorphous TiO2 nanotubes in comparison with their crystalline counterpart, anatase TiO2 nanotubes, using high-resolution transmission electron microscopy (TEM), in situ ion irradiation TEM, and molecular dynamics (MD) simulations. Anatase TiO2 nanotubes exhibit morphological and structural stability under irradiation due to their high concentration of grain boundaries and surfaces as defect sinks. On the other hand, amorphous TiO2 nanotubes undergo irradiation-induced crystallization, with some tubes remaining only partially crystallized. The partially crystalline tubes bend due to internal stresses associated with densification during crystallization as suggested by MD calculations. These results present a novel irradiation-based pathway for potentially tuning structure and morphology of energy storage materials. 

Abstract Localized atomistic disorder in halide‐based solid electrolytes (SEs) can be leveraged to boost Li⁺mobility. In this study, Li⁺transport in structurally modified Li₃HoCl₆, via Br⁻introduction and Li⁺deficiency, is explored. The optimized Li_3‐3yHo_1+yCl_6‐xBr_xachieves an ionic conductivity of 3.8 mS cm⁻¹at 25 °C, the highest reported for holmium halide materials.^6,7Li nuclear magnetic resonance and relaxometry investigations unveil enhanced ion dynamics with bromination, attaining a Li⁺motional rate neighboring 116 MHz. X‐ray diffraction analyses reveal mixed‐anion‐induced phase transitions with disproportionate octahedral expansions and distortions, creating Ho‐free planes with favorable energetics for Li⁺migration. Bond valence site energy analysis highlights preferred Li⁺transport pathways, particularly in structural planes devoid of Ho³⁺blocking effects. Molecular dynamics simulations corroborate enhanced Li⁺diffusion with Br⁻introduction into Li₃HoCl₆. Li‐Ho electrostatic repulsions in the (001) plane presumably drive Li⁺diffusion into the Ho‐free (002) layer, enabling rapid intraplanar Li⁺motion and exchange between the 2d and 4h sites. Li_3‐3yHo_1+yCl_6‐xBr_xalso demonstrates good battery cycling stability. These findings offer valuable insights into the intricate correlations between structure and ion transport and will help guide the design of high‐performance fast ion conductors for all‐solid‐state batteries. 

Nanoscale oxide-based negative electrodes are of great interest for lithium ion batteries due to their high energy density, power density and enhanced safety. In this work, we conducted a case study on mesoporous TiO 2 nanoparticle negative electrodes with uniform size and varying crystallinity in order to investigate the trend in the electrochemical properties of oxide-based nanoscale negative electrodes with varying crystallinity. Mesoporous solid spherical TiO 2 nanoparticles with a uniform particle size and varying crystallinity, i.e. , amorphous TiO 2 (A-TiO 2 ), partially crystalline TiO 2 (PC-TiO 2 ) and fully crystalline TiO 2 (FC-TiO 2 ) nanoparticles were studied. At low current rate (quasi steady-state), the specific capacity of the samples drops with the decrease of crystallinity. Ex situ synchrotron pair distribution function analysis reveals that the 1D zigzag Li ion diffusion pathway becomes expanded with the increase of crystallinity, which promotes ion mobility and charge storage. At high current rates (away from equilibrium states), however, the A-TiO 2 sample demonstrates slightly larger capacity than the FC-TiO 2 sample, both of which show larger capacities than that of the PC-TiO 2 sample. Both A-TiO 2 and FC-TiO 2 samples exhibit higher capacitive contribution to the charge storage and larger Li + diffusivity than those of the PC-TiO 2 sample, which explains their better rate capability. Moreover, the larger Li + diffusivity of the A-TiO 2 sample leads to the slightly larger specific capacity than the FC-TiO 2 sample at the highest current rate.